The Complexities of Psychopathic Bullying and Massive Societal Moral Confusion

The Complexities of Psychopathic Bullying and Massive Societal Moral Confusion.  

"Societal Moral Confusion" a Footnote for  2017.

By ABC-AntiBullyingCrusador

The links at the bottom of this article, will bring you to a couple of news articles, that are yet again, even more examples of what I often call "psychopathic bullying campaigns".  By this, I mean the involvement of at least one "psychopath" or more likely and more dangerous, a very intelligent "successful psychopath", who then often times involves witting or unwitting others, into bullying behaviors (called mobbing) against at least one "Target".

The links are news articles published towards the end of 2017.  They are not presented in terms of being "psychopathic bullying campaigns", they just are, as you'll see for yourself.  Both, accentuates what I mean though. Including the complexities of "who's the real bully", together with both "good and evil" spiritual movement and influence, which then spirals out of control, into massive confusion.  Seems Like "Societal Moral Confusion" is a Footnote for  2017.

If you REALLY want to know what I mean by "psychopathic bullying campaigns", click on all the underlined in-content links within this article.  Each link brings you to an article authored by ABC-AntiBullyingCrusador (except one),  which demonstrates what I mean as related to "psychopathic bullying campaigns", although the terminology, may vary, depending on the audience I was trying to reach, IE; "workplace bullying"etc.

One thing to always keep in mind, is that the word "victim" is NEVER used on ABC's own content, because of the term "victim mentality" that it is often associated with.  It is very different though, in that it is an acquired personality trait.  REAL "targets" have no preconceived notions about their victim hood and did nothing, not even unconsciously, to attract the attention of the perpetrator.

So Here's the two article links below;

1) http://ksn.com/2017/12/13/kentucky-lawmaker-facing-assault-allegations-kills-himself/
2) http://tucson.com/news/state-and-regional/lawsuit-claims-joe-arpaio-pursued-case-to-hurt-sen-jeff/article_66a6e5a9-f91d-50c2-875c-c0faafa728c1.html

Funny, I wrote an article about Sen. Jeff Frake, well before the article linked above from the Tuscon News. Here's my article;  https://bullyingandhatefulnessusa.blogspot.com/2017/10/lies-contradiction-of-truth.html

So who's the REALbully in these articles?  

ABC-AntiBullyingCrusador

-Won't You Consider Leaving a Comment? No Identifying Information is Required-

ALL Reader Comments are welcome and are especially ENCOURAGED when your comments differ from that of the article or offers a different perspective or experience as RELATED to the article. With the following EXCEPTIONS; 1) Any reader comments expressed in such a way, that may be interpreted as "incivility" or "Adult Bullying" will be moderated by ABC individually for determination. 2) In violation of Blogger Content Policy.

Devin Patrick Kelley Psychopath, NOT Successful

Devin Patrick Kelley Psychopath, NOT Successful

By ABC-AntiBullyingCrusador

I was hoping that Devin Patrick Kelley's mass murder at a Baptist church in Texas, wouldn't be as  gruesome as the media reported in descriptions of the atrocity that occurred last Sunday.  I don't even want to  repeat the details I read, thereby painting a picture in people's minds of what the horror was like as it played out. 

Remember, there is a small, but very dangerous segment of our society, who actually feel a type of satisfaction, even enjoyment over these heinous crimes that they themselves create.  I will repeat just one thing that Devin Patrick Kelley did to the small congregation of about 50, sitting in the pews that morning;

Not having  automatic, machine-gun style weapons like the famous "no motive", Las Vegas mass shooter Stephen Paddock, Devin Patrick Kelley squeezed off 400 ROUNDS, one at a time, and close-up, into the bodies of just the 26 dead and 20 injured, all of them sustaining multiple, if not dozens of gunshot wounds.

Devin Patrick Kelley was a bottom of the barrel psychopath who  undoubtedly, ENJOYED the pain and suffering he caused, made obvious by  the depravity of his crimes alone. There is a big difference however, between Kelley and the Las Vegas mass shooter Stephen Paddock.

If you've read my articles about Stephen Paddock, you'll notice I dropped the word "successful", when I describe Kelley as simply a "psychopath".  The difference is that Stephen Paddock was a psychopath who was also very intelligent.  Intelligent psychopaths are referred to as "successful psychopath", and  are able to conceal their true nature by mimicking normal caring emotions, amongst many other things that helped Paddock and others like him, blend in..

Where as Kelley, is a psychopath who simply isn't too smart, and/or has other coexisting mental, physical or social problems that make it obvious, that he posed a threat to society.  One article called it "red flags", or warnings signs that Kelley was dangerous.  Disastrously, this atrocity occurred NOT for lack of knowing.

This brings me to point out, that I, ABC, rarely mention "psychopath(s)" unless by comparison or just briefly as related to  the very intelligent, "successful psychopath", because psychopaths who are not smart, are OBVIOUS!  Here's a link to a well documented PDF,  titled 
Successful and Unsuccessful Psychopathy, A Neurobiological Model
 
When coming across an obvious psychopath in your day to day travels, do NOT engage the person in conversation, or step away using an excuse, when realizing you ALREADY engaged a psychopath.  Use one or two word pleasantries or responses etc.. Do not share personal details about yourself, family or schedule.  Seem uninterested, like most people really are, especially psychopaths! NEVER go into a room alone with a psychopath, make an excuse, you forgot something, anything, and walk away.  Bottom line, put distance between you and your suspected psychopath.

If anyone you come across, does or says anything that leaves you feeling concerned, even in retrospect, for the safety of yourself, family or others, notify the police if you think your concerns are URGENT.  When not, consider leaving a police report or notifying another authority etc. depending on the circumstances, such as if the concerning words or behavior were those of an employee within a school, or a workplace etc..

If you are a young person, or even an adult, who just feels uncertain or inexperienced about something someone did or said, leaving you feeling uncomfortable or threatened, talk to some one you trust. 

And, Don't Let The Bullies Get You Down!

ABC-AntiBullyingCrusador

Please Consider Leaving a Comment. -Bottom of Page- No Identifying Information is   Required!

ALL reader comments are welcomed and are especially ENCOURAGED when the reader's comments differ from that of the article or offers a different perspective or experience as RELATED to the article. With the following EXCEPTIONS; 1) Any reader comments expressed in such a way, that may be interpreted as "incivility" or "Adult Bullying" will be moderated by ABC individually for determination. 2) In violation of Blogger Content Policy.

Now, Devin Patrick Kelley, Motive-A Bully's Satisfaction?

First Rader, then Paddock,

Now, Devin Patrick Kelley, Motive - A Bully's Satisfaction? 

By ABC-AntiBullyingCrusador

There is just so much evil activity these days, what with all these shootings going on, it's hard to make sense of it all.  That is to most of us, being normally minded, caring people.  The psychopathically minded, are people born with a lack, or diminished ability, (within a spectrum of severity), to experience empathy or caring feelings for others.  These are the same caring feelings, that build strong caring families and relationships with others, and is the source of most people's enjoyment and satisfaction in life. 

Being very differently motivated, psychopathic minds think in ways that are unimaginable to others.  They actually feel a type of satisfaction, even enjoyment, over the pain, suffering or misfortune of others, that they often cause for the sole purpose of their own selfish satisfaction.

Even worse, some psychopaths are also very intelligent, and are referred to as "successful psychopaths".  They are "successful" in that their intelligence makes it possible for them to mimic normal caring emotions, while actually void of the sometimes troubling emotions that most of us express.  This leaves an appearance of mental stability, while actually capable of the most heinous crimes imaginable. For this reason, "successful psychopaths" are the most dangerous.

Good examples of these bottom of the barrel psychopathic minds, are Stephen Paddock, the famous "no motive" Las Vegas mass shooter, and the out-of-memory to most people, Dennis Rader.

Dennis Rader, was a serial killer who took people's lives, one or two at a time spanning between 1974 and 1991.  Rader enjoyed, even LOVED what would sicken most normally minded people, once bringing a corpse to his church, and taking a selfie with it, well before "selfies" were even a thing.  His wife and daughters had no clue, law enforcement arriving simultaneously at Rader's home to inform his wife, while taking Rader into custody a short distance away. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Rader

Both Stephen Paddock and Dennis Rader are "successful psychopaths" who committed the most heinous crimes imaginable, while being so smart, they were undetectable as criminal psychopaths. I consider both of these psychopathic criminals, "pure evil", in that they seemed ONLY motivated by their own satisfaction, even enjoyment, derived from the experience of playing-out these gruesome scenes, that they themselves cause.   If more people remembered Dennis Rader, there wouldn't be so much confusion about Stephen Paddock's lack of motive.
 
Now, Devin Patrick Kelley, walks into a Baptist church in Texas and starts shooting into the congregation killing 26.  Once again, the confusion of investigators, victims, and casual bystanders alike, about what the motive might be, is palpable.

As more information becomes known about Kelley's history, it's like a barely perceivable collective sigh of relief, that maybe this time, there's a reason, even a motive.  Not just a bully's (psychopath) satisfaction, having no reason or sense at all-

-A Bully's Satisfaction - Pure Evil-

By  ABC-AntiBullyingCrusador

Articles with related content on this website are titled and dated below.  Their title links may be listed in more than one area on the right margin of this article.  All of them can be found on the BLOG ARCHIVE by Month and Year.

"Hatefulness Without Prejudice" Sept. 2017

"Pure Evil, Unrecognized and Hidden" Oct. 2017

ALL reader comments are welcome and are especially ENCOURAGED when the reader's comments differ from that of the article or offers a different perspective or experience as RELATED to the article. With the following EXCEPTIONS;  1) Any reader comments expressed in such a way, that may be interpreted as "incivility" or "Adult Bullying" will be moderated by ABC individually for determination. 2) In violation of  Blogger Content Policy

Sexual Assault Without Sexual Activity, Who's The Real Bully?

Sexual Assault Without Sexual Activity?  Who's The Real Bully?

Allegation Against George H.W. Bush Age 93 -  By ABC-AntiBullyingCrusador

Prominent in the national news last weekend, were accusations made against former President George H.W. Bush age 93, for what is being described as "sexual assault".

It all started when actress Heather Lind age 34,  accused the former President of  "sexual assault" while posing for a photo shoot alongside the former president in his wheelchair, together "with his wife Barbara Bush" and a few others.  The photo shoot was to promote what Lind said was "a historical television show" that she was working on.

Lind stated that the "assault" consisted of  Bush Sr. "touching her from behind while in his wheelchair", "patting her rear", "telling a dirty joke", and the worst and last part of the "assault", described as a "pinch", dramatically occurring just as the camera clicked it's final shot.  Oh, and one more thing, "this incident occurred four years ago."
  
The problems though, are that Lind's description of the events that played-out, simply don't add up as "actual sexual assault".  Even the "pinch", is not in its self, illegal.

This all came out to the general public when Lind, describing herself as feeling “disturbed”,  "detailed her accusations in an Instagram post (now deleted) after first seeing a recent picture of former President Barack Obama with Bush Sr.", reminiscent of her own photo shoot with Bush Sr., four years ago.
 
Bush Sr. not motivated to do harm, together with the reality of Bush's behavior having NOT ACTUALLY causing serious or lasting harm, doesn't even meet the criteria of  "tactics" commonly used by "psychopathic bullies" -  "bully" more commonly known as a "successful psychopath" in the U.S.

Bush Sr., like all  "normally caring" people, just assumed that Lind, didn't understand. So in response to Lind's allegations, a statement from Bush Sr.'s spokesperson, tried to be candid, by describing in detail how the former president's behavior was really good, even humorous intentions, saying that Bush Sr. has been "confined to a wheelchair for roughly five years." Adding "When posing for pictures his arm falls on the lower waist of people with whom he takes pictures. To try to put people at ease, the president routinely tells the same joke — and on occasion, he has patted women’s rears in what he intended to be a good-natured manner." 

When these explanations were not accepted, Bush and his spokesperson, likely realized that this is NOT about a misunderstanding, nor resolving issues. Instead, like all psychopathic bullies, it's about taking their "target" down, for no REAL or VALID reason at all, except their own satisfaction.  In Lind's case, the "satisfaction" of  jumping on to the "sexual assault" bandwagon, by manipulating perceptions, using lies, half truths and deception, all for satisfaction of fraudulent financial gain.

That said, Bush Sr.'s spokesperson didn't bother denying  or explaining the allegations further. Instead, a more formal apology was made through the Daily News, stating;

“President Bush would never — under any circumstance — intentionally cause anyone distress, and he most sincerely apologizes if his attempt at humor offended Ms. Lind."

Lind, later made some rather odd, even cryptic comments, and was likely referring to her job as an actress, as her platform, when she stated - "What comforts me is that I too can use MY power, which isn’t so different from a President really." Further stating that she can "enact positive change", help people etc...as well as "call out other abuses of power when I see them." 

Lind's assertions about her "power" being "not so different from a President really", and how she plans to use her "power", "to enact positive change", etc,,,as well as to "call out other abuses of power" -- Is Lind's not so veiled attempt, to threaten Bush Sr., for what she PRETENDS to perceive, to be an "abuse of power." While, if you think just a little bit deeper, you come to realize who the REAL psychopathic bully is. 

For example:

Although Lind uses the term "abuse of power" as related to Bush Sr. and this incident, there is no mention as to how exactly, Bush Sr. is thought to have abused his power.  On the other hand, This all started when Lind, FIRST abused her OWN power, by making publicly disparaging comments against Bush Sr., detailing "her accusations in an Instagram post", before Bush Sr. even knew there was a problem at all.

Bush Sr. through his spokesperson responded to Lind's allegations immediately.  Where as abnormally uncaring people like Heather Lind, make publicly disparaging comments against their "targets"  (Bush Sr.)  often times, before their target is even aware a problem exists. And when the target becomes aware, their attempts to reconcile or to simply understand the allegation(s) are met with silence, or even worse, more allegations.

Lind also reportedly, "told her cast mates about the alleged sexual assault and that she decided to come forward because of  the bravery of other women who have spoken up and written about their experiences”, referring to the women who have accused Harvey Weinstein of sexual assault and harassment.  

Coming forward after a "sexual assault", NOT because of your OWN experience, but because of  “the bravery of other women who have spoken up”, -  Seems very nice, even noble, while just breezing through the article for the first time. But when you really read it or just think a little bit deeper, the inconsistencies and contradictions to the truth, become obvious.

For Example

Lind is using the term "sexual assault", while her descriptions don't include violence, force or sexual activity, not even kissing or groping, as if it some how compares to ACTUAL sexual assault victims. This is a common tactic used by psychopathic bullies, who sees an opportunity to exploit, such as the ever growing sexual assault and harassment complaints regarding the Harvey Weinstein scandal. Not to mention the newly evolving epidemic, of many other similar claims, against other high profile actors, producers, directors, photographers etc..
  
Hoping to change the perception of others about the validity of her own allegations, is likely the primary reason Lind made the statement about coming forward because of the “the bravery of other women". 

Many people reading articles about this incident, saw nothing wrong with Lind's perspective and motivations for making these publicly disparaging comments against Bush Sr., Made evident, when a few other women came forward with these same, almost exact allegations.

So who's the REAL bully? 

Ever hear of  "the uncanny similarity of tactics used by psychopathic bullies" ?

An article by that title can be found on the margin, on the right side, of this article.  Probably hidden in the BLOG ARCHIVE -Written in August 2017

Another resource, is an article, titled and linked below, written 2009.  It also talks about this "similarity of tactics" as related to psychopathic workplace bullying.

Tactics, The Bully Boss's First Brutal Tactic

A Curiosity If Your Interested;  I first wondered if phony sexual assault allegations made by younger women, against wealthy, prominent seniors, is one of those "unique tactics used by bullies alone" when I read an article a few years back, titled and linked below.

Retired-Judge-Accused-of-Sexual-Assault-

Here's to looking just a little bit deeper, for the inconsistencies and contradictions to the truth!

ABC-AntiBullyingCrusador   

-Please Consider leaving a comment.  Bottom of page-

ALL reader comments are welcomed and are especially ENCOURAGED when the reader's comments differ from that of the article or offers a different perspective or experience as RELATED to the article. With the following EXCEPTIONS; 1) Any reader comments expressed in such a way, that may be interpreted as "incivility" or "Adult Bullying" will be moderated by ABC individually for determination. 2) In violation o .blogger content policy 

Successful Psychopathic Bullying, Useful Information For The General Public

Successful Psychopathic Bullying, Useful Information For The General Public 

By ABC-AntiBullyingCrusador

There is so much useful information about bullying and hatefulness that the general public needs to know, it's hard to figure out where to start exactly.  The amount of confusion  accentuated by the Stephen Paddock investigation brought me to fully understand how little people know about these matters, although it's no secret that many people meet their end that way.

In articles about the Stephen Paddock investigation, it  was commented more than once, that some people didn't want to know, if Paddock is eventually found to have had no valid motive.  The general premise being, that it's impossible to defend yourself against someone like Paddock.  Knowing that there are psychopathic criminal minds amongst us, that appear normal but are capable of killing for no reason, is just too hard for some people to stand. 

Having tangled with a serial workplace bully boss (also referred to as a "successful psychopath") or two myself, I nearly met my end that way too, eventually totally undone though, and losing my job. This happened even after learning everything there is to know about work bullying, while trying to save my job.

Knowing everything there is to know about "successful psychopathy" doesn't necessarily mean you can totally take one or any of them down. It is so much more than that, but at least you gain an understanding of the whys, how's and don'ts, that may make things easier and keep you safer.

Criminal psychopathy is ONLY "indefensible" for people who have little or no true information and thereby understanding, of the real threats, as well as their real (and evolving) solutions, that help to ensure pubic safety.

More critically, days and now weeks have passed with an overwhelming number of both news and speculation articles published daily about the Stephen Paddock investigation. Just about all of these articles share factually incorrect information about "psychopathy" and many other mental health and social problems and conditions. This is causing a national resurgence of  misconceptions, especially in regards to the very intelligent and more dangerous "successful psychopaths".
 
Even before the Las Vegas shooting, I came across several articles and commentaries etc. which gave workplace or adult vs adult bully advice, more fitting for dealing with "schoolyard bullies". 
Feeling very concerned about totally false, even dangerous information out there, I think it best to start in the middle of what you need to know. 

Basic Bottom Line:  Criminal "psychopathic" minds, more commonly referred to as a "bully" and in the US, a "successful psychopath" are born with a genetic difference in their brains causing an inability or diminished ability by spectrum, to experience caring feelings and empathy for other people.  Instead, they derive a type of satisfaction, even enjoyment over the pain and suffering of others that they often cause.

FALLACY - Schoolyard bullying and workplace or adult bullying elsewhere, is the same thing. I should react to adults who bully in the same way as a child, I will "stand-up" and "call out" adults who bully me.

LESSON 1 - First of all it depends on what you mean when calling an adult a "bully".  Often the term "bully" is used to describe just about any adult who is expressing angry feelings.  There is a BIG difference, which at first is hard to distinguish, almost impossible when judging by appearances alone.  It might be easier to judge by the severity or intention of tactics they are known to have used in the past.  Normally caring adults who are just angry, use tactics that are not intended to do great or lasting harm.

Dealing with an adult (psychopathic) bully, is far more serious than a schoolyard bully who is first of all just a child, and most of them being just bratty and immature.  Adult psychopathic bullies (or "successful psychopaths") use premeditated tactics, that are uncannily similar case to case, even in detail as if they share some kind of common knowledge. Many of their tactics seem specifically used by bullies alone.  Whatever tactics they choose, they are intended to eventually cause serious and/or lasting harm.

"Standing-up" or "calling out" an adult psychopathic bully, is literally DANGEROUS
.
FALLACY - It's easy to recognize a "successful psychopath", they are "antisocial" and don't like to be around other people. They don't care about anyone but themselves.

LESSON 2 - Everything written in the FALLACY above IS TRUE!  I am just calling it a "fallacy" because it might as well be. People who do not look a little bit deeper than superficial appearances, just don't see it!

Examples in the Stephen Paddock investigation include several different statements made by investigators, family members as well as just public speculation, as to why Paddock could NOT have been a "successful psychopath" while if looked at just a bit deeper, actually prove it.

One example given was that Paddock was known to enjoy making family members and a few other people he was described as being "close to" happy, by sharing the free amenities and luxury accommodations he got for his high stakes gambling.

"Successful psychopaths" are so intelligent that they come to realize at an early age, that they lack the caring emotions that they see others express so spontaneously.  Viewing their "differently mindedness" as an advantage over others, they quickly come to realize the crippling disadvantages of behaving in ways that reveal their true nature.  Instead, highly intelligent criminal psychopathic minds like Paddock's, carefully learn to mimic the normal caring emotions of others.

I'm not saying that "successful psychopaths" never really enjoy making family members and people they feel close to happy.  Keeping in mind that "psychopathy" is experienced in a spectrum of severity, some psychopaths likely do experience a level of genuine enjoyment. 

More likely in my opinion, criminal "successful psychopaths" who enjoy being generous with close relatives and friends, experience a different type enjoyment over these relationships. Either their "differently mindedness" is something that they have in common with those few, or the few fulfill a different more personal (and hidden) need that casual bystanders like myself, can only guess at.

Behaving in normally caring ways though, is very advantageous for criminal "successful psychopaths" who are actually immune to the caring emotions that they mimic. Freed from the normally caring emotions that are so troubling to most people, leaves the impression of mental stability, while really capable of causing great harm.

This impression of mental stability is something  they can fall back on, if by chance "the mask of sanity" should somehow slip, and questions are asked.

One thing  to keep in mind  while trying to determine some one's true nature, is to not base your opinion on just a few superficial examples. Look at the big picture.  For example, Paddock was known to maintain relationships with close family members and a girlfriend.  He was married for a short time many years ago. People cited these relationships as reasons why Paddock could not have been Psychopathic.

While if you think about it just a little bit deeper, you come to realize things such as;  His whole life, and that's the extent of his relationships?  How come no one came forward claiming they were friends with Paddock?  He hunted and had lots of guns.  So where are his hunting and gun buddies?  This guy was a millionaire, yet there were no parties at his house or the tons of friends that people with tons of money attract!

So again, when relationships are looked at like this, just a bit deeper, it becomes obvious when Paddock and people like him, really are loners.

Remember - Think just a little bit deeper and Consider from a broader perspective. -SeekingTruth-

ABC-AntiBullyingCrusador

Moving On From Las Vegas Massacre Harder For Most

Moving On From Las Vegas Massacre Harder For Most  By ABC-AntiBullyingCrusasdor   

Moving on from Stephen Paddock's shooting massacre in Las Vegas is harder for most people than I thought it would be. Most people, still waiting for Paddock's "motive".

Now over two weeks, and three published articles about Stephen Paddock on this website later,  I continue to standby by my original assertions made in this, and the three previous articles on this subject, although varying in focus, wording, and depth of detail. My "assertions" are now in a bullet list below, OR you can read it like a paragraph, it's original format.

• Stephen Paddock was a "successful psychopath" and
• That alone, "successful psychopathy", was the sole cause (not motive) of this atrocity.
• I stated further that I believe it is a well known fact to experts in the field, that bottom of the barrel
• "Successful psychopaths" have no real, valid "motive(s)" at all for their psychopathic crime(s) against other people. Instead, They
• Experience a very differently minded type of "satisfaction" even enjoyment over
• The pain and suffering of other people, that
• They often plan and cause, for the
• Sole purpose of that experience alone. I stated further, that I was
• Repeating the (Bullet List) info, being
• Both 
• Hard to believe, and thereby, 
• Harder to remember. (Repeated, yet AGAIN)

Despite my confidence in my own understanding and ability to teach and reach others about these  matters, my hope of moving my readers forward into more personally useful information is some what stalled.  The Nation now standing paused and struggling to first understand Paddock's 'lack of motive' that "investigators" have as yet, failed to admit. 

"Investigators" as reported by the news media, continue to refer to Paddock's "motive" as something 'not yet found', when the truth is 'there is no motive' at all,  except for the psychopathic mind's own satisfaction.  

The good news is, that at least by some of the newly published news articles, it seems as though the media is just now starting to ease in to the possibilities that Stephen Paddock's reason (remember, he had no real or valid "motive") for the shooting, had more to do with his father's history of criminal psychopathy than not.

In that article titled (and linked), "Father's History Could Offer Insight Into Mind of Las Vegas Gunman", Stephen Paddock's father's criminal psychopathic history is described, along with commentary and quoted statements "typical of psychopaths".  This information is significant, in that "psychopathy" is a known genetic disorder likely passed down by young Paddock's father. The content is also useful in that the descriptions serve as good beginning examples of psychopathy, in which readers may then build on later, when learning more about recognizing psychopathy.

While yet another article titled (and linked), "Why The Unknown Motive In Las Vegas Is So Unsettling" explores why Paddock's 'lack of motive' is so unsettling (or is it REALLY a hint as to WHY, the Media IS HIDING (the no motive) TRUTH (for awhile)?  Either way, it is an interesting read which may play out in a significant way some how, only time will tell.

In the mean time, I intend on moving forward with the "more personally useful information"  that I mentioned, starting with my next article.  Readers may either "pause" with the rest of the Nation at this time, or may move on to the next article as soon as it's published and whenever you are ready.

I will step back with additional commentary, if and when the mass media ever publishes more articles that addresses Paddock's lack of motive any further in their coverage.

God Bless Target's of "workplace" and "adult vs adult bullying and mobbing" wherever it may be.


ABC-AntiBullyingCrusador

Tiny Hint 4U2 REMEMBER, Whether it be a workplace, a schoolyard or a single criminal psychopath shooting into a crowd at a concert, it is all the same - small, large or in between.  Dig deeper, if you find uncanny similiarities between your experience and that of unrelated KNOWN bullying and mobbing campaigns, that too may reveal them. ABC

Stephen Paddock Successful Psychopath, Reason Enough To Kill

Stephen Paddock Successful Psychopath, Reason Enough To Kill, By ABC-AntiBullyingCrusador

After reading my last news article of the day titled "Sheriff 'Absolutely Believes' Motive for Las Vegas Massacre Will Be Found", I decided to try and clarify some of the misconceptions  out there, and within this article its self, by commenting on two quoted parts of the article as examples. The article's full content is  linked below.

http://www.nepal24hours.com/sheriff-absolutely-believes-motive-for-las-vegas-massacre-will-be-found/

Quote from article linked above-

"(VOA): Las Vegas sheriff  Joseph Lombardo says he "absolutely believes" investigators will find a motive for the worst mass slaying in U.S. history. Investigators are mystified about why Stephen Paddock, 64 — a man who was financially well off and with no criminal record or apparent political or religious ties —"

ABC-AntiBullyingCrusador's Commentary AND Opinion, related to the quote above, from article content linked above.

It's unbelievable that NOBODY investigating Stephen Paddock's mass shooting, has not even suggested the obvious.  Psychopaths are KNOWN to share the same motivation - Having no real or valid motive at all!  "EXCEPT for  the SATISFACTION of a BULLY" ("Bully" more commonly referred to as "psychopaths" in USA)

 Stephen Paddock, obviously highly intelligent, is more accurately referred to as a "successful psychopath" in the USA. They are successful, in that their intelligence makes it possible for them to recognize their lack of caring emotions, that they see others express so spontaneously. Seeing this as an advantage, they carefully mimic the caring emotions of others.

They also fail to derive feelings of enjoyment like other people. Instead, they experience an odd type of satisfaction, even enjoyment over the pain and misfortunes of others, that they often cause.

Second Quote from article linked above-

"We cannot even rule out mental illness or some form of brain damage, although there's no evidence of that either," a Department of Homeland Security official said Tuesday".

ABC-AntiBullyingCrusador's Commentary AND Opinion, related to the second quote above, from article content linked above.

The way the article quote is stated, leaves doubt as to the depth of  true understanding.  By "mental illness", some people DO consider psychopathy a mental illness which is one of the largest misconception there are.  Fully grounded in reality and knowing the difference between right and wrong, psychopaths are NOT considered to be mentally ill in the usual sense of the word.

Stephen Paddock, was a bottom of the barrel spectrum successful psychopath. Expert at mimicking normal caring emotions while actually immune to the troubled emotions that normal caring people experience, leaving an impression of mental stability, while motivated very differently and capable of the most heinous crimes imaginable. 

Although the vast majority of  people consider the shooting in Las Vegas,  as extremely horrifying, Stephen Paddock carefully planned these events, for the SOLE PURPOSE of experiencing the MOST satisfying and enjoyable mayhem possible,  That he, himself caused!


For More Details, related articles on THIS website are accessible by clicking on the article title, listed on the right margin of this article.

"Hatefulness Without Prejudice"

"Barron Trump Bullied, How Real Bullies Think" -

For More Details, related articles on ABC-AntibullyingCrusador's Weblog are accessible by clicking on the titled links below.  To access the entire Weblog, Click on the tabs ABOVE article posts.


Adult Bully or Successful Psychopath, A Matter of Semantics

Schadenfreude A Bully's Satisfaction-By ABC


May God Bless and Protect, The United States of America and President Donald Trump

ABC-AntiBullyingCrusasdor

-Consider leaving a comment bottom of Page. No identifying information required-

Elusive Motive of Stephen Paddock, Not So Elusive

Elusive Motive of Stephen Paddock, Not So Elusive

Just about every news agency in the nation is asking the same question, what was Stephen Paddock's Motive? What's strikingly concerning about this question is that his motive is obvious.  Most people already have some knowledge of previous mass killers reported by the news media, but few are making the connections, that the depravity of their crimes alone, made the motive clear, in fact having NO real or valid motivation at all, EXCEPT for the psychopathic bully's satisfaction.  Think about it, did anyone question the validity of Jeffrey Dahmer's stated motive, "his own pleasure" ?

Psychopaths lack or have a diminished ability to experience feelings of empathy, instead, experience a type of  enjoyment or satisfaction over the pain and misfortune of others, which they often cause.
 "Successful psychopaths" like Stephen Paddock, are very intelligent making it possible to learn and mimic normal caring emotions.  Not only that, there are many other things that successful psychopaths do and use to support the false impression of normalcy.

In my opinion, people affected by psychopathy, especially successful psychopaths, pose the greatest hidden threat that most people are both exposed to, but know little or nothing about.

Even worse and accentuated by this horrible tragedy, is the amount of false and inaccurate information reported by the media, regarding psychopathy, successful psychopathy,  and the word  "bully".  The over use and misuse of the word "bully" probably the most egregious example of broad misconceptions perpetuated by the media.

Learn more about topics mentioned in this article individually linked below -

Workplace, Adult Bully or Successful Psychopath, A Matter of Semantics. By, ABC

Hatefulness Without Prejudice, Workplace Bullying. by ABC

Schadenfreude” – A Bully’s Satisfaction. By ABC.

The articles individually linked above, are from ABC's previous website titled                               ABC-AntiBullyingCrusador's Weblog. It focused on workplace and/or adult vs adult - psychopathic bullying and mobbing.  It contains some of ABC's BEST content, enriched by the BEST reader's comments, that only personal experience can provide. Articles such as "Tactics of a Workplace Serial Bully Boss" and "Workplace Mobbing. Workplace Little Mobsters" brings the reader through these experiences which are typically very similar case to case.  Readers, who are real  "targets" of workplace bullying and mobbing, but uncertain, come away knowing for sure. Dozens having commented how unbelievably close their experiences match my own.  Read about this and more, at the link below.

/ABC-AntiBullyingCruador's Weblog


Keep up with  new content on this website BULLYING AND HATEFULNESS USA - Focused
on subjects related to bullying and hatefulness within the USA, that is affecting the presidency, nation and the entire world. Related events continually unfolding before our eyes.


-Won't You Consider Leaving a Comment? - No identifying information is required.