Fact Or Fiction? More Allegations Against Former President George H.W. Bush

FACT OR FICTION? More Allegations Against Former President George H.W. Bush By ABC-AntiBullyingCrusador

Ever since the Harvey Weinstein scandal first broke, the media continues to be bloated with yet even more "fresh" sexual assault allegations, stories and opinions. The problem is that between the media, victims and alleged perpetrators, there are so many contradictions and inconsistencies from all the lies they tell, it's impossible to know fact from fiction.
For example, I wrote two articles on this website in defense of former president George H.W. Bush, titled and linked-
-
Sexual Assault Without Sexual Activity

Sexual Assault By Old Men

--only to find out that the elder Bush REALLY had a creepy butt squeezing or pinching tactic while being photographed with much younger women, which extended well before it could be excused by issues of aging, which I really thought it was. Instead, as reported in an article titled and linked--

Bush Groped Photo Seventh Women In Office

--the former president had been getting his butt pinching and squeezing perverted jollies for DECADES, made evident by the quoted article content below-

"A 55-year-old woman, who asked to remain unnamed, told CNN that at a re-election campaign fundraiser in Dearborn, Michigan, in April 1992, the then-67-year-old Bush grabbed her rear during a photo op. We got closer together for a family photo and it was like, ‘Holy crap!’” she told CNN, describing the incident. “It was like a gentle squeeze.”"

"Holy crap!" is exactly what I said too, when I found out how wrong I was about Bush. The one thing I was right about though - Groping-Allegations-Would-Be-Hard-To-Prosecute!

And that's not all, I almost wrote an article defending George Takei! LOL

Here's to thinking thrice, before defending someone accused of sexual misbehavior or crimes!

ABC-AntiBullyingCrusador

-Please Consider leaving a comment. Bottom of page- -No Identifying Info is Required-

ALL reader comments are welcomed and are especially ENCOURAGED when the reader's comments differ from that of the article or offers a different perspective or experience as RELATED to the article. With the following EXCEPTIONS; 1) Any reader comments expressed in such a way, that may be interpreted as "incivility" or "Adult Bullying" will be moderated by ABC individually for determination. 2) In violation of Blogger Content Policy

Sexual Assault by Old Men, More Allegations Against George H.W. Bush

Sexual Assault By Old Men,  More Allegations Against George H.W. Bush, Age 93  

NEWS and Opinion UP-DATE From Original Article, Titled and Linked  -  
Sexual Assault Without Sexual Activity  Published on 11-2-17   By ABC-AntiBullyingCrusador

Sexual abuse allegations against former president George H.W. Bush, age 93, continues to grow.  These allegations, now spanning into the years before Bush was still ambulatory.  This time, in the titled article and video, linked below.

George H.W. Bush spanks Teri Hatcher

The article title states that the former president "spanked" Teri Hatcher, the video and the quoted text below tells otherwise-

"President Bush is seen walking with several male friends and Hatcher, 52. He then taps her bottom various times before waving goodbye to her and going back to his pals."

Although the article title tried to change perceptions about Bush's behavior years ago, while still ambulatory, it is the same "touching from the rear", typical of the former president's behavior alleged by women more recently, while in his wheelchair.

Just when you think you get it, the article content then, switches back to the more shocking, viewer grabbing, article title's assertion that Bush "spanks" Hatcher, as quoted text from the article-

 "In the 2007 video, however, Bush is walking, later stopping to purposely spank the much-younger Hollywood actress."

This is another example of the mainstream media to either maliciously mislead perceptions, or just for the purpose of luring readers to their content for profit, switches from the title's assertion and text content, together with the misuse of the single word "spank(s)(ing)",  between two, starkly different viewpoints.  

Divorced from the TRUTH,  and stoked by the last presidential election, the media, just like Heather Lind, Bush's first accuser, the NFL kneelers, and many others, now think of, and use their jobs as a platform.  The media now entrenched in lies and #Fake News. 

The article went on to say-

"Amid the video drama, a third woman has now come forward to accuse Bush of groping her during a photo shoot, and telling her the now infamous “David-Cop-a-Feel” joke. Recalled the alleged victim, novelist Christina Baker Kline, to Slate:

“President Bush put his arm around me, low on my back. His comic timing was impeccable. ‘David Cop-a-feel,’ he said, and squeezed my butt, hard, just as the photographer snapped the photo.”

I couldn't help but notice specifically -

"His comic timing was impeccable. ‘David Cop-a-feel,’ he said, and squeezed my butt, hard, just as the photographer snapped the photo.” 

This is something that Bush's first accuser, Heather Lind said in my first article about Bush titled, "Sexual Assault Without Sexual Activity" And I, implied that the drama of  Lind's description was PHONY -  I apologize to Miss Lind! Former president George H.W. Bush, is much more consistent with his tactics, than I thought possible! 

So who's the REAL bully?   

Like all normally caring people of integrity, I must admit, the former president's tactics, being so specific and spanning for at least a decade, is kind of creepy, and muddies the waters a bit as to his motives and intentions.

But bottom line, this article failed to prove that Bush Sr.'s "touching from the rear" revealed any thing more concerning than his more recent encounters with women's "rears".

"Actual" assault, sexual or otherwise, causes serious and/or lasting harm.  Where as these incidents with Bush Sr., lasted just minutes, even moments, and obviously caused no physical injury or left any visible scars.

  

Touching, or worse, such as being kissed or groped by an old man, is actually quite common.  Most women have experienced these usually moments long "assaults",  at least once in their lives.  Finding the moments it takes to defend against quite easy, most women hardly find cause or reason at all for emotional upset.

Personally, I have never been sexually assaulted in my life.  But I have been suddenly kissed, grabbed and pinched, many times by old men.  These experiences, left me so unaffected, that I was half way through writing this article, before realizing that my own experiences were similar, to the women making these sexual assault allegations against Bush. 

The first time, I was just 14 years old while volunteering at convalescent home, when I was suddenly grabbed and kissed by an old man.  Later, as a registered nurse, it was quite common.  Many times, it seemed as though these old guys would get a little feisty and start grabbing just as they started feeling better physically.  After slapping their hand away and commenting how they must be feeling better, a big grin would almost always follow.

Being a normally caring person, I couldn't help but feel amused, when I saw that grin.  And I truly believe that most of these guys are just humorously motivated, thinking the reactions they elicit, are just as funny to the women.  After all, it's obvious that these guys couldn't hurt a fly if they tried - that being part of the humor!   

ABC-AntiBullyingCrusador

-Please Consider leaving a comment.  Bottom of page- NO IDENTIFYING INFO REQUIRED

ALL reader comments are welcomed and are especially ENCOURAGED when the reader's comments differ from that of the article or offers a different perspective or experience as RELATED to the article. With the following EXCEPTIONS; 1) Any reader comments expressed in such a way, that may be interpreted as "incivility" or "Adult Bullying" will be moderated by ABC individually for determination. 2) In violation of Blogger Content policy

Devin Patrick Kelley Psychopath, NOT Successful

Devin Patrick Kelley Psychopath, NOT Successful

By ABC-AntiBullyingCrusador

I was hoping that Devin Patrick Kelley's mass murder at a Baptist church in Texas, wouldn't be as  gruesome as the media reported in descriptions of the atrocity that occurred last Sunday.  I don't even want to  repeat the details I read, thereby painting a picture in people's minds of what the horror was like as it played out. 

Remember, there is a small, but very dangerous segment of our society, who actually feel a type of satisfaction, even enjoyment over these heinous crimes that they themselves create.  I will repeat just one thing that Devin Patrick Kelley did to the small congregation of about 50, sitting in the pews that morning;

Not having  automatic, machine-gun style weapons like the famous "no motive", Las Vegas mass shooter Stephen Paddock, Devin Patrick Kelley squeezed off 400 ROUNDS, one at a time, and close-up, into the bodies of just the 26 dead and 20 injured, all of them sustaining multiple, if not dozens of gunshot wounds.

Devin Patrick Kelley was a bottom of the barrel psychopath who  undoubtedly, ENJOYED the pain and suffering he caused, made obvious by  the depravity of his crimes alone. There is a big difference however, between Kelley and the Las Vegas mass shooter Stephen Paddock.

If you've read my articles about Stephen Paddock, you'll notice I dropped the word "successful", when I describe Kelley as simply a "psychopath".  The difference is that Stephen Paddock was a psychopath who was also very intelligent.  Intelligent psychopaths are referred to as "successful psychopath", and  are able to conceal their true nature by mimicking normal caring emotions, amongst many other things that helped Paddock and others like him, blend in..

Where as Kelley, is a psychopath who simply isn't too smart, and/or has other coexisting mental, physical or social problems that make it obvious, that he posed a threat to society.  One article called it "red flags", or warnings signs that Kelley was dangerous.  Disastrously, this atrocity occurred NOT for lack of knowing.

This brings me to point out, that I, ABC, rarely mention "psychopath(s)" unless by comparison or just briefly as related to  the very intelligent, "successful psychopath", because psychopaths who are not smart, are OBVIOUS!  Here's a link to a well documented PDF,  titled 
Successful and Unsuccessful Psychopathy, A Neurobiological Model
 
When coming across an obvious psychopath in your day to day travels, do NOT engage the person in conversation, or step away using an excuse, when realizing you ALREADY engaged a psychopath.  Use one or two word pleasantries or responses etc.. Do not share personal details about yourself, family or schedule.  Seem uninterested, like most people really are, especially psychopaths! NEVER go into a room alone with a psychopath, make an excuse, you forgot something, anything, and walk away.  Bottom line, put distance between you and your suspected psychopath.

If anyone you come across, does or says anything that leaves you feeling concerned, even in retrospect, for the safety of yourself, family or others, notify the police if you think your concerns are URGENT.  When not, consider leaving a police report or notifying another authority etc. depending on the circumstances, such as if the concerning words or behavior were those of an employee within a school, or a workplace etc..

If you are a young person, or even an adult, who just feels uncertain or inexperienced about something someone did or said, leaving you feeling uncomfortable or threatened, talk to some one you trust. 

And, Don't Let The Bullies Get You Down!

ABC-AntiBullyingCrusador

Please Consider Leaving a Comment. -Bottom of Page- No Identifying Information is   Required!

ALL reader comments are welcomed and are especially ENCOURAGED when the reader's comments differ from that of the article or offers a different perspective or experience as RELATED to the article. With the following EXCEPTIONS; 1) Any reader comments expressed in such a way, that may be interpreted as "incivility" or "Adult Bullying" will be moderated by ABC individually for determination. 2) In violation of Blogger Content Policy.